View my complete profile
posted by Good Wife @ 9:58 AM
Clearly it's the old quantity versus quality thing....and personally, I like the photo of your *mouth.*
I'm not sure I get Ward's quality/quantity distinction. Both shots of your assets have both. And as for the comments, not sure I get his point. I do know both shots are great, but with your nomination at BoB, it is likely that a higher influx of new readers have seen the latest shot, and might not have gone back to the older posts yet. Having said that, "please ma'am, may we have another"?
I think both guys are right.The first guy is right in that a shot of the full chest seems more complete. The shot of the single breast, while nice, seems a bit...odd...I guess. I would say try a shot of the full chest, fully exposed, and see what kind of response you get!The second guy is probably also right, because I am also one of those recent readers who got here through the BoB awards list. However, I had seen both because I have started reading back through the back-posts.
GW,Don't worry, baby...they're both wonderful. One is a bit abstract...a glimpse, while the other gives a more complete picture...and you can even make out the trim waist above the curve of your hips...or am I imagining that...
Enjoyed both pics, GW...and your stories. But when are you going to write one about an English man? (You mention in your profile that you like our accent ;-) )
Nice blog by the way...very entertaining!
Just think how many votes you'd receive if you posted another picture (hint, hint...). I'm hoping you'll keep showing us pieces until we can put together the whole puzzle.
Hmmm, all good suggestions but I thought it was more the allure thing. The clothed, but obviously ample and seductive shot left all sorts of tingly feelings as opposed to the very clean and easy bare shot which just let it all out in the open. One, a picture of promise...the other, promise delivered!I always thought the photos of a partially clothed person seemed more seductive than completely nude shots because they just burn with promise. Kind of a "leave 'em wanting more" thing?Who knows. It could just be me.
Never mind a story about an Englishman, what about one with a Welshman. :)
Because two is better than one? I like them both but the most recent shot gives a better overall picture. Call me a Perv but I just hope you'll post pics of what they will become over the next several months. The wife & I took pics as hers developed & it was & still cool to see the progression. -anon
Ed, I've been waiting 7 months for a story featuring a "good ole boy form Alabama" so I wouldn't get your hopes up.I think the cleavage shot got to us all cause it leaves some to the imagination...and that dead on view is just awesome!
because everybody loves the tease, frankly. i think.kenwww.kenandariel.com
Just my opinion...the close-up boob shot is too close up for me. I like it, but too close. The cleavage shot gives me a full perspective of things.
Chuck: I know, but as a Welshman there's no way I could let an Englishman have a clear run. :)And Phin - 'full perspective' - you're not kidding....
I think we should get a variety of poses over the next feww months - especially through the development stages. I know I did this with my wife and they certainly were great to watch as they became bigger. Love all you write - pics and text.Svensvenschindler.com
Perhaps too simple a possibility.... but the cleavage shot clearly states that we are viewing cleavage, and gives us with dirty minds that the cleavage shown is yours. The nipple shot is great.. but it has no comment letting us know what we are actually viewing the GW's nipple itself. Point being.. we are simple creatures.. we need to be told that we should be impressed.
i like the double breasted shot. it shows a how full you are and how awesome they would look, say at the desk just down from mine.
I like both as well, but I love the cleavage one more. I like that it shows more of you and it allows me to use more of my imagination. :)
Post a Comment
Create a Link